Cities are seeing an increase of people who live alone or in small families, while extended families are rarely. These changes are a negative development.
As families become smaller, the traditional family support network is disappearing, and this can have a negative impact on children as they grow up. For example, parents in nuclear families are facing childcare problems, it becomes an expensive and stressful part of daily life. Without the help of grandparents or relatives, busy parents must rely on babysitters, caregivers, or nannies. The absence of an adult’s family member means that friends, television, and the internet become the primary influence on children’s behavior. It is no surprise that children without the care of parents are extremely different. Perhaps it will have a rise in psychological and behavioral problems.
The trend of living in nuclear families is becoming more damaging because of the psychological effects of reduced human interaction. Markedly, individuals who live alone having nobody to talk to, share problems, or discuss any issues that happen in society or in their daily life. They forgot the constant stimulation and hustle and bustle of a large family. Likewise, they cannot live like a normal person for an extended period. Passive distractions such as television, video games, or internet surfing are replacing the lack of human contact. It is associating with boredom, loneliness, and have feelings of isolation or even alienation. It is such a harmful disease as a mental illness.
In conclusion, I believe individuals will thrive in an extended family, so it is worrying that many people choose to live changes are a negative development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38059701493 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99527176219 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7051729445 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241814207531 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672369851267 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793398642443 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165815122917 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729795120989 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.