Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do you agree or disagree

With the help of technology, many employees are working from home. It is believed by few that it is only profitable for the workers not the employer himself. I totally disagree with this statement as it is a win - win situation for both of them

First of all, working from home helps the employees by giving them flexible hours to work which lets them do their chores whereas it gets pretty hard for them to manage their 9 to 5 job with their home chores. It even provides them with the comfort that they need. Some people find it difficult to get up early in the morning and get ready till 9 am but if people are working from homes, they can even work in their pyjamas. Doing your stuff from your home is also less tiring which is also a plus point.

Moving to the benefits of the employers, there are a whole lot of benefits for the employers if their employees are working from home. Firstly, they can save a lot of money by not paying any rents for the offices. Secondly, they can benefit from not paying for any equipment which saves them a lot of money. Employees are more productive at home and they can get their work done easily which is considered profitable for the employer.

To conclude, I believe that it is not only profitable for the employees but it is also profitable for the employers. Workers can work efficiently and employers can make profits from it. So it is a win - win situation.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...ty hard for them to manage their 9 to 5 job with their home chores. It even provide...
^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
... benefits of the employers, there are a whole lot of benefits for the employers if their ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43461538462 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3702904689 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8285859951 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6923076923 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282771957803 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114667579668 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741969680603 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184440765978 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333887111851 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 50.2224549098 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 12.4159519038 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.