Many factors motivate people in the workplace. Of these, money is the most important. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is agrued that many factors motivate individuals in the workplace, of these revenue is the most neccessary. From my point of view, i mostly agree with this notion because of its practical in the reality life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence modern technology, citizens have more requirement, so financial is hugely significant for individuals. Not only can money provide the best vervice for their life such as education, medical and entertainment, but also new innovation will be appoached which have numerous benefits for their career and the development of their nation. Furthermore, their adolesence can learn in well education to contribute their abiblities for the inproment of the country. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by kay Harvert, the famous scientist and professor which was about the sucessful of the business when their employees have high pay. The statistic showed that nearly every compaies has got a various of achevements.
However, we can not negate the drawbacks of this problem for the social life. The individuals are just concentrate on their profit and has forgot the other value, harmful ìnluence will be led by this action to the young generation and social, reducing the nation improvement Morover, many people staff has lost of their motivation and inspiration, lacking of the business growth.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally agree with this statement, but it still have some nagative aspect for the individual. The manager need to have clear plan to improve their employees motivated for the development of their nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this revenue' or 'these revenues'?
Suggestion: this revenue; these revenues
...tivate individuals in the workplace, of these revenue is the most neccessary. From my point o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...on, medical and entertainment, but also new innovation will be appoached which have numerous b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies has got a various of achevements. However, we can not negate the drawbacks...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
...ust concentrate on their profit and has forgot the other value, harmful ìnluence will ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, lacking of the business growth. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some nagative aspect for the individual...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as for, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20664206642 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85360838946 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7811516988 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968754227196 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414653710932 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712377779912 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755650377018 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655440494376 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.