In work place there has been considerably lower proportion of women in high profile posts such as chief executive officers, directors and managers. A growing number of people believe that companies should prepare to push to women into top managerial jobs. I am totally in the favour of this idea. In this essay, i will present some relevant examples.
One of the most important benefits is that it avoids discrimination. Not only it avoids unfairness but also it creates supportive and pleasant work environment to have a better balance of genders in management and senior levels. For instance, most women suffer markedly higher levels of sexual discrimination, lack of managerial support and negative comments about their pregnancy. Moreover, often male bosses puts them at disproportionate risks and women are juggling with family responsibilities such as caring for children and elderly parents leaving them feeling drained. So, undeniably, only female managers could turn out this type of sticky and thorny situations.
Another advantage is the thriving performance. What I mean by this is that start-ups lead by women and innovative firms with more women on top management are successful and profitable. What's more, companies with more gender diversity have more revenue, customers and profitable market share.
In a nutshell, although it is common belief of giving prefernce men to women in top jobs, I believe government ought to increase the pipeline of women for higher posts so that women would feel a sense of complete security and would gain career progression in work place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the favour of this idea. In this essay, i will present some relevant examples. ...
^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nagement are successful and profitable. Whats more, companies with more gender divers...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, for instance, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31225296443 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92140588076 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660079051383 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9352066548 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115071554264 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357520556507 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427153164357 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727423494455 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394739963511 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.