Many people are travelling to other countries. Why? Is it a positive or negative development?
The tourism industry has witnessed a significant development recently. A great number of individuals are now capable of venturing to other nations. Reasons for this tendency and my perspective regrading whether this trend is beneficial or not will be mentioned in this essay.
There are several reasons for this occurrence. Since universities in developed countries are advanced and progressive, many students would want to go there in order to study and accumulate more experience and knowledge. For example, USA has many prominent and prestigious universities. Besides, these schools also provide learners with a great number of scholarships, which attracts many students. Additionally, people have deep passion for travelling because they want to experience more about the world. Venturing to other countries helps them make friends, learn more about their cultures and taste local sustenance. Thus, this could broaden their horizon.
Although paying a visit to other nations might have some negative impacts to the environment, I believe this trend could have more benefits. By visiting a country, travelers could contribute to the economy of the country they set foot on by buying local commodities. Therefore, that country could develop more to support their citizens. In addition, people could understand more about each other and could reduce the possibility of war. For example, the president of USA, Donald Trump has paid a visit to Vietnam recently. Vietnam had a warm welcome and gave him many memorable memories and he came home safe and sound a few days later. This would lead to a solid and trustworthy relationship between two nations.
In conclusion, this trend results from the need of study and accumulation of knowledge and experience of individuals. In spite of drawbacks of this trend, I believe there are far more advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36426116838 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9167343569 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6742505377 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1578947368 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199329169714 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552687358038 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482985323526 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105255838363 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781126179385 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.