Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside. Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Living in rural areas is believed to naturally provide people with a healthier living condition, while urban cities have been hitherto offering numerous medical advantages to their citizens. In my estimation, I support the idea that living in rural parts is more beneficial based on the clean and peaceful environment that they naturally own.
First and foremost, the deciding factor involved in living in the countryside is that people are less likely to suffer from consistent pollution because of a large variety of plantations and natural habitats. To exemplify, Ca Mau, an agricultural area located at the bottom of Vietnam, not merely contains a thousand hectares of cultivated land where rice is grown, poultry, and cattle are fostered but also an insufficient number of factories with loads of toxic pollutants. This consequently enables the possibility for farmers and retailers to enjoy a higher quality of the fresh atmosphere and stay away from environmental-related diseases such as lung cancer or respiratory infections. Conversely, it is justifiable that people from urban areas are more accessible to the health care system.
Contrary to popular perception, modern cities are able to fulfill people’s medical requirements due to a vast number of health care facilities. One case in point is that access to different health infrastructures, regarding clinics, checkups centers, and vaccination centers, has been made possible in Ho Chi Minh City since they are all over every district. Not only will this convenience prevent society from suffering severe repercussions, but it also draws immediate attention when it comes to chronic diseases. The eventual outcome is the incentives to have their health regularly checked in order to put an end to abrupt sicknesses.
On balance, although developed areas create considerable opportunities for people to cure serious health problems, the sustainability of a healthy lifestyle with clean air and atmosphere is inconceivably solid proof of living in the countryside. I am opposed to the conception of having a better quality of life in urban places because of the polluted sky and lower-quality foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | nav200408@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | vidung | 89 | view |
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 95
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What can be done to deal with this situation 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to put an end to abrupt sicknesses. On balance, although developed areas cre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45697329377 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17531267304 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629080118694 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7815425021 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.25 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0833333333 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174458550806 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580408166885 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523744571057 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101618375371 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318505302333 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.