Many people believe that they should spend all the money they earn to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save a large portion of their earning for the future.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, people have been trying to determine the impact level of the sallary they should conserve. One part of human thinks that they should spend all the money for present life while others decide to preserve the main part for the future. I believe that saving earnings and investments for so-called “bad days” are a good strategy for any employee.
To my mind, people cannot predict future and the risks that are connected with their jobs and income. Health problems are the most common ones that need money in most life cases. Moreover, employers with family should think not only about their own future, but also about their childrens and partners. For example, 10 years old Max, my friend's son, has serious dental problems and medical service is always expensive. Hence, I am convinced that conservation a part of salary allows human to feel more freedom and calmness not at the present time but also in the future.
On the other hand, some opponents consider that future times are far away and they spend their money carelessly for present life. This opinion often involves young people whose life experience is too short and not full. An urgent need for money can happen at any time and it is better to be prepared mentally and financially. According to an article in the journal «World of investments», 67% of population feel problems with extra money for critical needs. Thus, I think that spending all the money for present life is a dangerous life path.
To conclude, I am all for the idea that humans should think about the future and preserve a part of their earning. Moreover, I believe spending the salary for only today's needs could be a big trouble in prospect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81443298969 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34981199658 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4758936856 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370243016308 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118282103849 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831066956292 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227017507842 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859360857382 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.