Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does.
Nowadays with the dramatic development of the Internet, distance-learning curriculums have been more and more popular. There is a fact that these programs have received a large number of people interested in it. Despite being an important alternative to formal education, it is not as beneficial as attending a traditional class, as far as I am concerned.
First of all, formal teaching is a wonderful method for learning because, from these mistakes which they have when attending college, students can have self-awareness and learn from these ones. Besides that, instructors who have extensive experience in dealing with students from different backgrounds can correct and guide them to figure out all the problems according to the capacity of each student. In contrast, in the distance learning method, this is completely missing and thus the effect is less productive. Additionally, studying in a traditional way will give opportunities for the students to interact and gain skills from other classmates, which is not possible if they are sitting in front of a computer or a TV.
On the other hand, the distance learning method has much weakness which is caused by the convenience and popularity of the internet itself. It requires a high focusing and self-motivated from students because it happens in the cases without the appearance of teachers. For example, young students can lose their attention because of many games online, music videos or thrilling movie series, etc. They will over time develop bad study habits and waste their time and money. Moreover, when sitting in front of the computer for several hours, students may be suffered from eye or spine diseases.
In the conclusion, by looking at facts, the formal teaching method has many outstanding advantages for students. While distance learning can be a modern trend, it can never be the same as studying at a college or university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | ngoctuan | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | ngocminhzinh | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | asmita acharya | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-07 | Navneet bal | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 36
- The picture below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- The process below shows how drinking water is made using solar power Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given below 79
- The charts below show the total number of cruise passengers and their percentage according to age in 1975 and 2003 in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... fact that these programs have received a large number of people interested in it. Despite being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
... can have self-awareness and learn from these ones. Besides that, instructors who have ext...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...less productive. Additionally, studying in a traditional way will give opportunities for the student...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, may, moreover, thus, while, for example, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19805194805 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95852272616 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5242756714 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152288957676 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528554251231 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446230041212 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102521590932 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437524054434 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.