Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why
could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Nowadays, more and more people love to watch exotic movies than domestically produced films. There are several reasons behind this tendency, and I think governments should help local film-makers by giving more financial support to them.
It is clear that there could be some causes which make foreign films attract more people. Firstly, these movies are invested with the amount of money by many sponsors around the world. Because of having enormous budgets, oversea films are always made with tremendous information and computerize technology effects which have a huge charisma with audiences by famous directors. Secondly, the excellent contents, which based on the best novels, are produced by an experimented producer that will attract lots of people. For example, “Harry Potter” is always the must-watch foreign film of all the time.
I suppose that governments should help local film industries to face with exotic films by investing in finance for them. Therefore, the domestic producers can hire good actors and actresses if authorities subsidize for their budgets. Moreover, the directors can recruit several technical experts to make the eye-catching advertisement for a film to attract more audiences. Besides, because of the sponsor of the governments, film-makers can also introduce the discount tickets and promotion solutions to movie-lovers. For instance, the movie “Tam Cam” attracted many people with the supporting of local authorities, and it also was the best film that was produced only by the Vietnamese movie-makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed only by the Vietnamese movie-makers.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61181434599 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90772716145 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611814345992 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6036085145 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376712341699 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132367015958 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103168673562 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281755593031 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12291906829 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.