Many people think that bottled water should be banned Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people think that bottled water should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, pollution caused by plastic water bottles has become more serious and ubiquitous across the globe. Therefore, many people believe that bottle-packaged water should be prohibited. I strongly agree with this idea because bottled water is not only expensive but also not environmentally-friendly.

On the one hand, some opponents of this idea may argue that bottled-stored water cannot be abolished due to its convenience. It cannot be denied that most water bottles are made of plastic, which was invented to replace other materials, such as heavy and inexpedient glass and pottery. Especially, in some hard circumstances, these plastic products are more useful. For example, when people have to go to forests or deserts where it is difficult to find drinkable water. Therefore, bottled water is considered a practical invention.

Nonetheless, the use of these products should be eliminated considering its devastating effects on the environment and high prices. Firstly, a new type of vessel which is rather slight, durable, environmentally-friendly, and able to reuse many times has been created
As a result, users can save more money when using this new product. For example, in Vietnam, people have to pay at least 8 thousand dongs for a single-use 500-milliliter water bottle while it only costs them around 100.000 VND for the new type like Lock & Lock’s inox container, which can be used for several years. Secondly, after being used, a large number of these plastic water bottles are thrown away instead of being cycled, which affects severely the environment since on average, a plastic bottle takes around 450 to 1000 years to decompose entirely. This leads to hard consequences, such as lacking clean water, polluted foods and vegetables.

In conclusion, owing to the above disadvantages, I believe that bottled water should be forbidden for good.

(295 words)

Votes
Average: 9.3 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-07 aceg1000 78 view
2024-12-07 aceg1000 78 view
2024-12-07 aceg1000 78 view
2024-12-07 aceg1000 78 view
2024-11-16 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
Essays by user linh allie :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut also not environmentally-friendly. On the one hand, some opponents of this ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r is considered a practical invention. Nonetheless, the use of these products s...
^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble to reuse many times has been created As a result, users can save more money w...
^^^^
Line 6, column 345, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eral years. Secondly, after being used, a large number of these plastic water bottles are thrown ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water, polluted foods and vegetables. In conclusion, owing to the above disadv...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38047138047 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25535873281 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6484790776 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292313725113 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110157079297 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899007949672 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186663946971 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771270316565 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut also not environmentally-friendly. On the one hand, some opponents of this ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r is considered a practical invention. Nonetheless, the use of these products s...
^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble to reuse many times has been created As a result, users can save more money w...
^^^^
Line 6, column 345, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eral years. Secondly, after being used, a large number of these plastic water bottles are thrown ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water, polluted foods and vegetables. In conclusion, owing to the above disadv...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38047138047 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25535873281 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6484790776 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292313725113 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110157079297 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899007949672 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186663946971 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771270316565 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.