In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that animals is one of main food sources of human being. Actually, the average of animal products consumption experiences upward trend day by day. While I have to admit this perspective is accurate to somewhat extent, I still hold a notion that people should not use animals as a crucial sources of food or other products, simultaneously, develop other alternative suppliers is more remarkable.
Nowadays, the governments and their habitants are faced with public health challenges, such as cancer, heart disease, malnutrition, caused by excessive consumption of meat on regular basis. people must improve and make balance their daily diets, simply, we should reduce the amount of products from animal like meat, fish and add more vegetable, diary in order to not only ensure nutrient but also can enjoy better health. In particular, there are many products which contain high levels of protein, such as mushroom and tofu, a kind of nutrient only found in meat and we can use it as a substitute.
In the other hand, animals not only use as food suppliers but also the source of medicine and clothing. medicines manufactured from animal is received litter endorsement by majority of environmentalists and global citizens. currently, more and more medicine is produced from herbs and other types of plant-based, can cure many diseases and prolong human life. Besides, thousands of wild animals are killed annually with their fur taken to produce coats and accessories. Thanks to the development of science and technology, people have researched and created artificial materials that can fulfill our need, this is the important achievement to protect dangerous animals.
To recapitulate, despite the beneficial economic of animals, I think people should decline their expenditure of products from animals like food or medicine in order to prevent them from extinction. In terms of governments, they should enact legislations about environment to restrict their dwellers as well as advance public health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
... being. Actually, the average of animal products consumption experiences upward trend da...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...ple should not use animals as a crucial sources of food or other products, simultaneous...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...e consumption of meat on regular basis. people must improve and make balance their dai...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Medicines
...so the source of medicine and clothing. medicines manufactured from animal is received li...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Currently
... environmentalists and global citizens. currently, more and more medicine is produced fro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, if, so, still, well, while, i think, in particular, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34796238245 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93049296793 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583072100313 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3328553602 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195733910878 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750858667122 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583804778875 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1199787038 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386307404509 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.