More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
These days it is common for parents to give their children electronic devices such as tablets and computers. Although parents argue that this foster children's technological skills, I believe this development has more drawbacks than advantages in children's development.
One benefit of allowing children to play with computers and tablets is that keep children occupied. Children need lots of attention and this might be exhausting for parents. Therefore, giving young ones electronic devices would give parents a break from entertaining them. This could potentially reduce the parent's stress and improve family relationships.
On the other hand, there are several disadvantages to this habit. Although it may help children to learn technologic skills, they only play games and computer skills already thought in schools. Firstly, children's free time could be utilized in other activities. Children spend time with their peers since this plays a crucial role in their development. While playing with other children, normal toys and the outside, children develop creative, cognitive and social skills.
In addition to this, playing with computers and tablets could affect children's health. This activity makes them physically less active which might lead to serious diseases such as obesity. Also, looking at screens for long periods could damage their eyes. Moreover, it is difficult to monitor children's activities on their computers, they might consume contents that are not appropriate for them. This could harm their mental health.
In conclusion, the drawbacks of allowing children to use computers and tablets outweigh the benefits. While it may give parents time, it could damage children's physical and mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | susannora | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Pham Van Nhan | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Phuong Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | rachell | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- People spend large amounts of time and money on clothes hairstyles and makeup to change their appearance Is it important for people to be concerned about the way they look What are the consequences of focussing on physical appearance 41
- The two maps show an island before and after the construction of touristic facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Human activity has had a negative effect on ecosystems animals and plants across the world Some people believe this cannot be changed while others feel we can still take action to protect living things Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ldren spend time with their peers since this plays a crucial role in their developme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62068965517 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67751679119 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7213088185 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458825427808 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146482069608 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950279090102 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26592754044 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704435619788 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.