More and more people want to buy clothes, cars and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the number of people who tend to purchase items such as clothes, automobile and other things from famous labels is increasing. The reasons behind this trend will be outlined in this essay, in my perspective, although there are some positive results of this tendency, I believe that it is outweighed by the negative effects.
To begin with, the bias of using large brand products mostly stems from people's beliefs on personal possessions reflecting wealth, social status and upgrading appearance. In addition, goods like clothes and accessories from popular brand names such as Hermés or Adidas with high quality and fashionable designs. Therefore, these merchandises are more suitable for enhancing people's outside than those of less well-known trademarks. Furthermore, some types of productions having great value like cars from luxurious brands are usually sold at exorbitant prices because of their expensive materials or unique features. Hence, they are used to show others the wealth or social class of the owner.
On the other hand, this tendency brings both merits and drawbacks in different ways. Countries, where renowned trademarks are based, are more likely to have a strong and healthy economy. For example, the US - the home nation of many large brands, such as Apple and Microsoft, has been the strongest economic superpower since the late 20th century partly since the products os these enterprises not only favoured in domestic but also in overseas. However, it is harmful to assume that only well-known goods guarantee quality as well as a desire to prove themselves despite financial difficulties. For instance, following a survey of People's Daily in China, young people in this country are facing " big trouble" because of the habit of overspending. Details, 53% of college student borrowed money to buy precious items such as Apple tablets or iPhone phones that can not afford to pay off debt.
In conclusion, the trend of consumer goods from high-end brands comes from people's perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and appearance. Although this tendency can generate benefits to the business market, the negative far outweighs such positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to showing'.
Suggestion: used to showing
...als or unique features. Hence, they are used to show others the wealth or social class of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
... the late 20th century partly since the products os these enterprises not only favoured ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brands'' or 'brand's'?
Suggestion: brands'; brand's
...e trend of consumer goods from high-end brands comes from peoples perception of person...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...brands comes from peoples perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3908045977 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71492957624 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646551724138 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2634755871 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.066666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246251464376 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689911237838 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368297904495 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133402235666 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489035118624 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.