More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, most people tend to buy something from well-known companies such as buying clothes and car. There are some factors leading to these attitudes, but I think this trend brings some negatives development.
There are some reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, when customers buy a product from famous brands, they can exact about the product quality, such as, lady buys clothes for them and their husband, and they are sure that the clothes which are excellent quality. Moreover, some wealthy people are willing to buy some products which are expensive because they want to look trendy and show off their status. For instance, famous companies rent famous actors to advert their products such as a car, and this will create a trend. As a result, some young people who really love their Idol, they will imitate their Idol by possessing what they wear and look like famous people.
I believe that this trend will bring some negative development for social. Firstly, this trend affects to young people because they are very young and cannot awareness about using the money, such as, they cannot earn money, however, they are willing to buy expensive clothes. This reduces the financial of their parents. This leading to they can become a crime; they will steal money from their parent to buy this item. Secondly, People who just buy a car from well-known brands, this will make small companies cannot develop and expand their products to people. For example, people buy a car from some popular foreign companies, as a result, some domestically business collapse because they cannot find profit to fill up their finances.
To sum up, the growing consumption of famous brands can explain that people want to look fashionable and trendy. However, I think that there are bring some disadvantages and not the positives trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'negatives'' or 'negative's'?
Suggestion: negatives'; negative's
...des, but I think this trend brings some negatives development. There are some reasons ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...trendy. However, I think that there are bring some disadvantages and not the positive...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03908794788 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35870207414 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488599348534 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8205669266 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165304179733 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707978469981 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331577965613 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128117886909 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261374250088 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.