More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing, and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, we can see an increasing trend of immigration of specialists from undeveloped or poor countries to developed countries. They believe that they can find the better job and can support their future in that countries, but many people do not agree with this idea, while others believe that is a common movement all over the world. In the following paragraphs, I am going to discuss this issue, and give my idea at the end.
First, there are lots of the pool factors in developed countries for someone who wants to improve their life, job, education, and even their future especially for some experts namely engineers, doctors and other qualified people. On the other hand, in many developing and undeveloped nations, there are some push factors that lead to the movement of people from different parts of the world.
Second, some people argue that this situation is unfair mainly because rich countries can access experts’ skills, abilities, and after that their country will be the vacancy for them. Therefore, after a short-term period, their societies face different problems that, which most important one is the lack of expert forces in different part of their societies.
Last but not necessarily least, opposite of people who think that this situation is not fair, many people believe that this is a normal trend in the world because human always trying to reach good situation for their life.
To conclude, I think that movement of experts has plus sides and of course negative sides, but the most important thing is to help it for equilibrium in money, wealth agglomeration in different parts of the world. Therefore, people can access equal facilities, money, job and so on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, i think, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03546099291 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59705233891 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9656492455 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203498685363 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843849225674 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064421197147 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111143103244 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286949030301 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.