More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.
Why? Who benefit from this, the community or these young people?
In present-day society, the growing number of young people from affluent countries are doing volunteering abroad in underdeveloped or developing countries. There is a wide variety of reasons for this activity, and I believe that both these young individuals and the community reap the benefits.
Many convincing reasons associated with this phenomenon. The most significant of which is the voluntary works is considered as a way of life for many youths. In other words, a long tradition of seeing volunteering as a form of charity, based on altruism and selflessness and it is inspired by the concept of mutual help. Besides, young volunteers could understand this meaningful actions, whether big or small will have an impact on someone’s life. For instance, by teaching someone to speak English is synonymous with helping them break the cycle of poverty by giving them access to better job opportunities. Their kids and families will have a better quality of life for generations to come.
It is undeniable that oversea volunteer acts have been beneficial to both sides. Concerning the young, one of the better-known benefits of volunteering helps them to integrate with the world. For clarification, the best way to make new friends and strengthen existing relationships is to commit to a shared activity together. Furthermore, volunteering gives them the opportunity to practice and develop their social skills. In regard to poorer countries, many children who have difficulties in attending school can have the opportunities to continue their studies by assistance from foreign volunteer teachers. For example, in areas meeting with difficult, children forced to leave the school or even they cannot go to the school like the same ages simply because they have to earn the money to support their families.
In conclusion, poor countries’ goverment should have more policies to support volunteers who come from rich nationals so they can be more easily involved in carrying out their good work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33018867925 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07833367369 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.111741118 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176416887044 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539850634086 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679802321368 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134579337738 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927661238982 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.