The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this globalised era, transport and traffic congestions are the leading and alarming menaces. An alternation to cope up with it is that people should migrate from rural or countryside regions to well furnished towns. In my assertion , it is not a prosperous remedy and I am partially agree with this notion.
To commence with, the first reason is population burst. It is conspicuous that world’s demographic graph is escalating day by day and people are lacking of proper living places. Therefore, if villagers encouraged to live in metropolitan areas it would produce a great chaos in cities. As a result,
urban people will suffer too. The reason is that, government will not be able to stipulate required facilities, basic needs, employment to the masses. Consequently, it imbalances the atmosphere of towns. Apart from this, everybody owns private vehicles nowadays. Mostly youngsters, whether they belong to rural or urban areas owns a car for their colleges and for jobs. Interestingly, adults, children, has to arrive their workplaces , schools, colleges on time which is almost same from 8am to 10am. As a result, a great blockage.
Moving to further dilemma , countryside and suburbs will lack of residents. Moreover, industries and factories are situated in these areas and owners get workers and sometimes get raw material from villagers. Inadequacy of workers and material will curtail their productivity as well as it affect the GDP of the country. Furthermore, it has been noticed by a survey that villagers often have difficulties to acclimatize in modern lifestyle which can lead to stress and depression among them. However, at some extent this migration can raise the living standard of dwellers of remote areas.
To conclude from above confabulation it is axiomatic that to cater with traffic and transportation issues it would be a terrible approach to uplift people from countryside to metropolis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to well furnished towns. In my assertion , it is not a prosperous remedy and I am ...
^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... a prosperous remedy and I am partially agree with this notion. To commence with, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce a great chaos in cities. As a result, urban people will suffer too. The reason...
^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... employment to the masses. Consequently, it imbalances the atmosphere of towns. A...
^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...children, has to arrive their workplaces , schools, colleges on time which is almo...
^^
Line 4, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from 8am to 10am. As a result, a great blockage. Moving to further dilemma ,...
^^
Line 6, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... blockage. Moving to further dilemma , countryside and suburbs will lack of re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29315960912 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00310106806 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0520437055 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5263157895 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168788513213 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420522500246 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411631263852 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943327928404 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400507073112 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.