The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be take to solve the problems?
It is true that more and more individuals have a tendency to migrate from agricultural areas to bustling metropolis. There will be undoubtedly some negative consequences for both places; societies can take steps to mitigate these potential problems.
There are two main reasons why people are inclined to move to conurbation. As to cities, influxes of immigrants flocking to cities can result in uncontrolled urbanization, placing a burden on residents’ standard of living and social issues. This is because this development can trigger an increase call for housing estates and job vacancies. However, metropolises’ resources are in short supply; especially, housing market, with only a small-scale distribution. As a result, unemployment rate and cost of living become higher; therefore, many people have to live at a subsistence level or even below the poverty line. Moreover, this trend can give rise to an agricultural recession. Take Vietnam as a convincing example. Agricultural industry is considered as a sector with high proportion. While thousands of people migrate to conurbations, the agricultural workforce can drop out, resulting in an ineffective exploitation of arable land in agricultural industry.
There are several actions that the government could take to solve the problem described above. Firstly, administration should allocate the government budget to arable lands, lifting farmers out of poverty with a stable income. By doing this, create job opportunities so that they can deter themselves from moving to other cities. In addition, work permits in central metropolises should be regulated. For example, highly-educated workers can be allowed to work in the company’s headquarters, and manufacturing plants with thousands of manual workers should be located in rural areas.
In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as many people have a tendency to move from agricultural areas to cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63787375415 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33962901087 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614617940199 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2775703672 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27231460845 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772486055136 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700603870527 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181252999338 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636242811098 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.