New technology have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
The use of modern technology have transformed the children's way of spending their leisure time. In my opinion latter outweigh former because this trend vanishes social bonding as well as many health issues arises among the young childrens.
To begin with, new technology had changed the lifestyle of kids in numerous way. Firstly, the consumption time on latest technology have diminished social relationships among childrens. In the past, children play together in ground and create different creative things with their imagination. While, nowadays children play video games, uses social media a lot in their free time. For example, new technology leads the children to become introvert as they do not build any bonding with other young ones living in the society.
Secondly, abundant of health issues causes because of the use of unique technology by children in their break period. To explicate it, children spend hours sitting on one place while playing games or using technology. They do not exercise enough to keep themselves physically fit. As a result of this trend, children are facing health problems like obesity, bone weakness etc. For instance, in many parents get -together parties of parents, there foremost concern has been seen on this trend which is directly results into health problems.
In conclusion, emerging technology altered how the children spend their spare time. In my perspective, this trend has more cons such as, it finishes socio-culture relationships and also causes many medical problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arents get -together parties of parents, there foremost concern has been seen on ...
^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on this trend which is directly results into health problems. In conclusion, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66431862772 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6642589724 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.3571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379646382029 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12629876469 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772054739832 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228213542604 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049268041998 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.