Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience.
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether the latest development of the food industry is improving our well-being or not. Alongside the arguments from both views, the latest sociological discoveries have casted light on the implication in accordance with the time-saving benefits and the change in average nutritional content obtained by general residents living in cities. This essay will discuss both sides using the examples from these academic work.
To begin with, the ensuing time reduction is intuitively perceived as a positive driver for enriching one's life. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly, the packed food we brought from supermarket save us time on searching recipes. Secondly, with the processed ingredients, citizens can start cooking immediately. In fact, an empirical research from the Hong Kong University ascertained that the use of canned or packed food could save up to 70% of the food preparation time. Consistent with this line of thinking is that, without this change, the working parents might require to spend an hour prior to enjoying a meal with their families. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that the use of these processed food increase the likeliness of work-life balance.
Although there is a case of saving time in a busy life, the impact of intaking these instant delicacies should not be overstated, in particular the shortfall of nutritional content that is widely found in fast food. This is largely because the fast food shop tends to cater meals that are high in fat and sugar, which in turn induce chronic diseases entailing obesity and heart attack. For instance, having conducted an extensive study, the Hong Kong University established that frequenting fast foot shop is responsible for the surging figure of incidence of obesity in middle age group. Admittedly, the preparation of homemade food, to a considerable extent, is costly and time-consuming; however, the treatment for chronic disease should not be neglected. Consequently, it is possible to state beyond doubt that people should choose the food wisely.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggesting the shift in food preparation can meet with the need of societal development with a cost of potential health problem. Having said that, it is predicted that the fast food and processed food will grow in importance in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ived as a positive driver for enriching ones life. The central reason behind this is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'empirical research'.
Suggestion: empirical research
...can start cooking immediately. In fact, an empirical research from the Hong Kong University ascertain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
...ange, the working parents might require to spend an hour prior to enjoying a meal with t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33858267717 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88496458315 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593175853018 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8817911747 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143667492443 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483236701257 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210055768685 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836923035978 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189640324018 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.