Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In the globalisation era, citizens from many countries have a tendency of utilizing some health treatments in lieu of going to hospitals. This phenomena has emerged itself with contentious issue that a myriad of people concerned about. Therefore, there are a score of people assume that taking alternative medicines instead of going to any curation agency is a positive development. However, I believe this development is bringing more detrimental effects than it's beneficial sides itself.
There are numerous of rationals to assert that the alternative treatment methods will be a hazardous development. The most compelling reason is that the alternative medicines do not have any guarantee for its quality products. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that there are a predominantly of number low-quality medicines which could take to 80% of the total alternative medicines, according to a newest index claimed by the scientists. In consequence, the denizens choosing the traditional treatments as an alternative way will be prone to some side effects of medicines.
Another considerable reason to support the perspective specifying the adverse impacts that alternative treatments may cause is that the hospitals without patients might have potential result to insolvency. This is because nearly 90% of medical facilities in the world are following the self- employed economy which means that with the downward trend of patients, there will be no money flow onto any hospital's budget. For instance, the patients do not want to pay for medical fees which they found its cost is over their family's budget. As a result, they tend to spend money for the alternative medicines extracted from natural ingredients as their core treatment, and the medical facilities will lost a lot of patients to visit to their doctors.
In conclusion, while the phenomena mentioned from above split two perspective of drawback and beneficial development from alternative medicines impact on residents. Regardless of any opposite view, I strongly perspect that the medical treatments that people use as the second choice will have more disadvantageous than merits it brings. It is advisable for government to enact a resolution to prevent all alternative medicine products to enhance citizen's health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...eatments in lieu of going to hospitals. This phenomena has emerged itself with conte...
^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...u of going to hospitals. This phenomena has emerged itself with contentious issue t...
^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...tal alternative medicines, according to a newest index claimed by the scientists....
^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...atment, and the medical facilities will lost a lot of patients to visit to their doc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46348314607 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06632872661 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6874081708 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267911206887 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892610492788 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424343386429 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158192850444 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148222475876 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.