The phenomenon of people themselves creating films for the support of digital technology has been growing in popularity, not just big companies. From my point of view, I consider this a positive development.
I am of the opinion that this is a positive trend as because it offer affordability to low-income people. This can be explained by the fact that with the development of technology, people can download some useful applications especialing in editing pictures and videos with no usage fee. As a result, they gain the ability to make fantastic films according to their hobbies and capturing memories in life, which they can open to see in the later future. For example, CAPCUT, a widespead app to make films, recording the significant growth in the number of users, with about 50% in 2023.
Another reason is that it promote creativity of young people. Obviously, without fees, people can be given great chances of accessing effective technology to produce high-quality films. Humans can learn and practice to take videos, edit and improve their skills in film industry. Therefore, they comfortably meet their demand to continue pursuing their hobby in every situation. This has been successfully in a part in marketing industry, who are required to have capacity of manufacturing films and they are ready to show that skill in their CV to get a gold ticket to enter a big corporation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology is a powerful
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
... this is a positive trend as because it offer affordability to low-income people. Thi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice taking'.
Suggestion: practice taking
...igh-quality films. Humans can learn and practice to take videos, edit and improve their skills i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly believe that technology is a powerful
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06639004149 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9347923222 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626556016598 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4619730826 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184838791862 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588064563243 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402731024474 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103038107051 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308509576804 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.