In the modern era, women are progressing in every field, they are contributing to society and the economy similarly to the men. Moreover, women have a dual responsibility, they work and they have to take care of their home as well. In my opinion, to promote gender equality, men must participate in household chores.
Firstly, in older times, most of the women stayed at home, their primary concern was to nurture their children, cook, and clean. However, with the development of society women are attending school, and colleges more than ever, also they are working in advance industries. Hence now they have to divide their time among a job, home, and their children, which is quite cumbersome. They struggle to complete their tasks and feel stressed and exhausted. If their husbands can help them in menial tasks such as cleaning, laundry, and cooking, it will take some burden off from their shoulders, moreover, they can relax and spend some time on their leisure activities.
Secondly, men have been dominating in this society, they have always been designated as bread earner, however, women are contributing equally financially, they are also providing for their family, hence splitting chores will incorporate a sense of equality among women. In addition, if they find their spouse more supporting, they can concentrate on work and excel in their career. However, since men are not used to of working household chores, they may take a longer time than women, but with proper training and patients, it is possible to bring them up to the speed.
In conclusion, nowadays men and women are equally responsible for their household tasks, by sharing responsibilities men and women can help each other out in a congenial way
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...they are working in advance industries. Hence now they have to divide their time amon...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 156, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a congenial way" with adverb for "congenial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s men and women can help each other out in a congenial way
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08041958042 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70115022328 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4122805282 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0672870957737 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315290720642 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.021551653506 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498125142714 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00579906611875 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.