Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
Tons of food, especially from restaurants and shops, are wasted everyday in today’s world. There are two reasons behind this issue and some measures can be taken to mitigate it.
Perhaps one of the key reasons is the improved standard of living. People’s income has been increasing annually while, with the advent of modern technology, the costs for producing primary ingredients such as rice, wheat or meat, have been reducing greatly. As a result, dishes from restaurants are more affordable to most people, to the point that customers often do not consider buying the exact needed amount of food, which is excessive in many cases. Another reason is the lack of appreciation for food that is prepared by others. In fact, it is easy to underestimate the value of the work of others, which is, in this case, the food from shops. If people try to cook their meals everyday, they will probably understand more how much effort is required to prepare a proper meal and remind themselves of reducing the amount of leftover to the minimum.
Turning to solutions, the most effective one should probably be introducing laws and regulations regarding the thrown-away food. Governments can impose high taxes on this category, which will act as a deterrent for wasting food. Restaurants and diners can also set the food limit that one person can buy so that their customers might consider the appropriate amount when purchasing. Lastly, in the long term, schools and the authorities can create education programs and public campaigns related to the food shortage issues around the world to gradually raise the awareness of both students and the citizens.
In conclusion, while the reasons for wasting food stem from the lack of consideration of the public and the reduction of costs for food production, this phenomenon can be mitigated in the short and long term through a combination of actions from both the government and food businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- Task 2 Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 89
- Task 2 Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Task 2 Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Many people today are worried about young children playing video games What problems may these games cause children and society as a whole How could these problems be reduced 61
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... from restaurants and shops, are wasted everyday in today’s world. There are two reasons...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...hops. If people try to cook their meals everyday, they will probably understand more how...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06542056075 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72455509645 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9228946406 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348454652125 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116306053234 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660267275646 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217688589221 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206156814309 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.