Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
Who does not know about the fact that in the modern world people waste a whole lot of food which they are buying in the supermarkets, cafe and restaurants? I suppose, it is happening because mankind in the majority does not feel the value of food and the consequences of wasting. Many things could be done in order to shrink the amount of food which is thrown away, the main is setting the restrictions for manufacturing and developing ecological attitude among people.
In my opinion, not every person understands the real cost for food which is the damage nature. And this is a reason why sometimes people buy too much food, could not eat it, and as a result they have to throw away the expired products. Producing food on the fabrics consist of a lot of stages which affect negatively from every side. For example, to get one burger it is needed to waste more than 100 litres of water. As we know, planet will face a water deficit in the near future, Capetown almost had it - a couple of years ago it was close to Day Zero.
First step, that could be done in fighting with products wasting, is the establishment of particular rules for product production in order to avoid overproducing. That means, shops and restaurants have to count more accurately how many products will be bought over a period, and in line with this produce the needed amount. For instance, all the ecological shops have such strategy - they do not produce more products that are needed.
On the other hand, we should pay attention to consumption too, and give people corresponding guidelines. The best for it is setting role models, and sharing these ideas from all the possible sources. To exemplify, all the advertisements should say about ecological problems, water crisis. The more programmes, podcasts and articles about food shortage in developing countries, social problems and environment protection should be on TV, in the Internet and social media.
To conclude, reduction of wasting food depends on several actions, either from the side of production and from the side of using.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 78
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the causes of this Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access in modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...that in the modern world people waste a whole lot of food which they are buying in the su...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, for instance, i suppose, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70175659542 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562146892655 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0603142 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327938727501 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941699834194 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689535642124 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170743029733 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750274989249 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.