Today, a considerable amount of food bought from shops and restaurants tend to be thrown away irresponsibly. This phenomenon occurs due to a number of reasons and several feasible solutions should be adopted by businesses and individuals to improve the situation.
There are a variety of reasons why people waste food. One primary motive behind this is the development of agriculture. Thanks to the advancement in agricultural technologies, the production and distribution of food have more and more streamlined than ever. As a result, people are more likely to access food sources with inexpensive prices and purchase a large quantity of food which mainly causes waste. Moreover, it can be explained by the fact that consumers have not recognized the harmful implications of throwing away food. For example, many people don't have a habit of making a detailed plan when shopping which leads to wasting more money on buying more food products even if they are not actually consuming all of it so when that food is out of date or perishable, throwing it is inevitable.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to alleviate these problems. Firstly, the government should impose strict laws on waste food. For example, restaurants may charge extra money to people who order a lot of food dishes but cannot finish them so that they will make a thoughtful decision on what they eat. However, it is important to note that this phenomenon cannot decrease if people don’t raise awareness about food consumption. To this end, each individual should develop a habit of making lists of ingredients and foodstuff before going shopping so that they will not only save money but also don’t waste food products.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to throwing away food and people”s awareness is a major reason. Hopefully, with some effective measures in regard impose heavy fines on wasting and making a detailed list before shopping, this bad phenomenon will decrease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing away food. For example, many people dont have a habit of making a detailed plan ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...leading to throwing away food and people”s awareness is a major reason. Hopefully...
^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: NO_SPACE_CLOSING_QUOTE[1]
Message: There should be a space after a closing quote.
Suggestion: ” s
...leading to throwing away food and people”s awareness is a major reason. Hopefully,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16459627329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83977471557 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2958105707 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41371143133 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149107233998 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106256959894 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236266170101 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588955157467 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.