Food is considered to be a basic need for humans to live a long healthy life; however, its wastage has become a controversial issue, thereby buying from the shops and restaurants, and further, the analyzation for reasons and solutions is to be commenced in the subsequent paragraphs.
The certain causes need to be considered, which seem to be responsible for this wastage of food, the first and foremost is excessive show off of wealth in the front of others as most of the modern people tend to procure the food from shops and restaurants not only for satisfying their hunger but to show their status also; thus, they do not know the importance of food, and therefore, they keep on wasting it. Besides this, the proliferation of discounts on online food is a prominent cause of its wastage because people order more food items, while in actuality they are not able to finish their given food orders; eventually, such kind of choices lead to the wastage of food.
The implementation of different measures may have fruitful results that are immensely significant to solve the issue of food wastage. Firstly, government has to live up to their responsibility to make the people aware in terms of the proper usage of the food, unless they are unable to eat; thereafter, it should rather be served to the poor people than throwing away, it is evident that the poor once does not have a capability to arrange the meal in a whole day. Secondly, people can avoid the wastage of food, thereby preparing domestic food according to their taste, which is less spicy and full of high nutritious value.
In conclusion, purchasing food from the shops and restaurants cannot be considered negatively, but its usage should be in an appropriate way to solve this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...red negatively, but its usage should be in an appropriate way to solve this issue.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82450331126 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74445787596 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546357615894 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.9306943759 49.4020404114 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 208.142857143 106.682146367 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.1428571429 20.7667163134 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.4285714286 7.06120827912 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373458677372 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172978716106 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584934607087 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210083398611 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747284303819 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.0946893788 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.