In this competitive society, academic university degrees are considered to be more essential than hands-on experience when employers seek new people. Although there are some reasons for it, I strongly believe that this is completely a negative movement.
There are two factors why some recruiters prefer formal qualifications to life experience when they recruit new employees. Firstly, in many professions, university qualifications are considered evidence that people underwent a process of acquiring theoretical knowledge and practice. In order to become a doctor, for example, a candidate has to carry out experiments and spend lots of time to study about them. Secondly, this trend might be a good way to save time for employers because they do not take their time to train non-academic applicants how to work properly.
However, I think this is a negative development and both academe and non-academic should receive an equal chance in the recruitment process This is because many people decide to work right after school instead of pursuing tertiary education. In addition, after a long time of working and studying, they are also capable of doing many things without a formal education. A typical example can be seen in the case of Bill Gates, who launched Microsoft Office and then became a billionaire. Thanks for deciding to work immediately, many people had a lot of practical skills and soft skills which can improve the connection between them and others to have a great result at work.
In conclusion, this trend attribute two main reasons, I still believe that this is a negative progress for above-mentioned arguments
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'negative progress'.
Suggestion: negative progress
...n reasons, I still believe that this is a negative progress for above-mentioned arguments
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25190839695 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98997021991 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618320610687 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2906830364 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250824177163 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911604505663 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077865683026 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145855607294 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075598449005 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.