Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In the era of globalization, the development of technology is an inevitable consequence. As a result, the tremendous growth of modern technology has changed human interaction in various ways. In my opinion, the influence of technology on relationships has both positive and negative sides.
The penetration of technology has impacted different kind of relationships, vary from business to education and social life. First, the emergence of online-based communication tools such as Skype allows business people in different countries to collaborate without spending time and money to travel for direct meeting. Second, in the education field, with the virtual communication exchange, students now can freely contact to their teachers for learning problems while reduce the reluctance to open to teachers. Finally, the introduction of social networks like Facebook encourage people to make new friends and find people who share common interests through their computers.
On one hand, the progress of technology has considerable advantages not only in work but in social context as well. It replaces old-fashioned and time-consuming tools such as written letters or telegrams with the more convenient tools such as email, phone or video call. However, there are many cases where people substitute their real-life relations with digital communication and alienate themselves from communities. For example, young people tend to abuse social network to make friends online rather than having real friendship with their peers in the real world. This can lead to a poor relationship with their friends and limit the communication ability.
In conclusion, it is certain that technology has caused remarkable revolution in communication; however, the influences of technology on human interaction have both positive and negative sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...to their teachers for learning problems while reduce the reluctance to open to teache...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72893772894 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17131933098 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6770769856 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219987896291 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767086894531 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418976448723 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135864143232 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319265419082 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.