As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think the drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, as more and more cars are being owned, the subject of who has the responsibilities for covering the increasing amount of money that has to be spent on improving the road systems has been becoming controversial. While I accept that there are persuasive arguments in favor of government paying, I believe that car owners have to play a role in this matter as well.
On the one hand, drivers covering the costs could be advantageous. First and foremost, as drivers would be the ones who pay, instead of curbing public spending on developing road systems, the government could allocate more resources to other systems, such as healthcare systems or educational programs, which are constantly in need of new developments. For example, spending more on cancer research in order to save more desperate lives, or on illiterate eradication programs in rural areas. Second, this could be a crucial method to encourage the utilizing of many means of public transportation, such as trains or buses. In turn, as more people use public transport instead of driving their own cars, the unsolved problem of traffic jams in various metropolises may finally found its needed solution. Singapore is the perfect example which embodies this theory. Finally, as the government doesn't have to cover expenditure on road systems as well, the pressure of tax funding by citizens could be released and less tax money would have to be collected.
On the other hand, spending public money on improving road systems is one of the major responsibilities of government. In my opinion, I believe that government sponsorship of road development could be a necessary stage in ensuring the welfare state of its citizens. As the people don't have to worry about this kind of expenditure also, they could be more competent with the country they live in.
By and large, while I support the fact that government should be paying the amount of money for road repair and improvement, I believe car owners have to hold a partial responsibility as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'many means'.
Suggestion: many means
...al method to encourage the utilizing of many means of public transportation, such as train...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...this theory. Finally, as the government doesnt have to cover expenditure on road syste...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re state of its citizens. As the people dont have to worry about this kind of expend...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, may, second, so, well, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as, by and large, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9215944766 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.32068051 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.153846154 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271513762351 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095916921704 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549425545641 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180865743001 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290500855376 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.