Transportation is a compulsory part to transfer people to other places or countries, whatsoever travelling or working. It is often argued that building a faster railway to connect each city is more important than changing other transportation. I believe that the most critical is to invest on the existing public transport, like taxi or bus.
To begin with, there is a mature of railway system now. Enjoying a fast train to everywhere is not difficult to deal. For instance, if we are staying in Hong Kong as well as finding a suitable method to arrive in Beijing, High-speed railway would be the innovated measurement for us. Travelling a particular country is easy via the completely railway system, as long as it can reach by train. Also, while we may not satisfy with the speed of the typical train, it is improved now and that is an old news about the train which can drive over 300 kilometers. Therefore, I believe that the mature railway technology would not be the first issue.
On the other hand, there are several developments on road designing that we should concern. In Hong Kong, traffic jams are the frequently matter which would obstruct our daily life not only affect working but also influence leisure time. So, enhancing the efficiency of road transportation, such as restricting vehicle driver to drive on the busy highway on the weekday, could prompt a smooth road management. Also, it is able to strengthen the working rate of employees who take the bus every day, since the spending time on the bus is reduced.
In conclusion, because of the mature railway technology and there are a lot of recommendations can be researched on existing public transport, I believe that the circumstance of public transport should be superior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'old news'.
Suggestion: old news
...l train, it is improved now and that is an old news about the train which can drive over 30...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89860139822 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4518264805 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215870847547 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700083515891 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537918037984 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134671615842 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661387781954 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.