in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
discuss both views and give your opinion
Transportation is one of the most topics that attracts great attention. Some people claim that the authorities should spend the budget on redeveloping railway systems, whereas others suppose investing in public transport is more necessary. This essay aims to discuss both views and express my opinion.
On the one hand, although modifying the communication system may bring positive impacts on regulating the volume of commuters, <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">expanding novel road lines </span>is considered<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> having several problems</span>. The government requires taking more effort on either rearrange railway systems or demolish numerous buildings (recreational places, educational centers or resident houses) to make room for the new roads. Because of the lack of landscapes and population growth, it is simply quite a mission impossible.
On the other hand, spending finance on the quality of public transportation is by far more beneficial. Firstly, it is one of the most convenient ways for any individuals to reach their destination regardless of hustle and bustle city at a reasonable price. For example, workers can commute to the company on time without worrying about traffic jams. Secondly, using public means of public transport may contribute to alleviating traffic congestion instead of using private vehicles. Therefore, the number of exhausted fumes and air pollution which is emitted by manifold vehicles tend to decline. To be more eco-friendly, using the public transportation system should be highly encouraged.
In conclusion, from my perspective, the government should take into account investing money in upgrading the quality of transportation rather than expanding road systems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96850393701 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67392664536 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0789575325 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19309885635 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643584753338 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054737935173 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112028401341 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574127123385 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.