There is a widely held perception in many parts of the world today that it is essential to spend a large amount of money on the construction of railway lines for fast trains. Yet, there remains some disagreement because the other part believes that money should be spent to make the existing public transport better. The issue of whether money should be spent on constructing new railway lines or not is certainly a contentious one.
On one hand, as the amount of traffic is waxing, it is better to invest in the construction of new train lines as it will take the pressure off the roads and reduce traffic congestion. Constructing railway lines for high speed trains or metros will also save a lot of time that is otherwise wasted being stuck in the traffic jam. Also, for a city to be considered as a metropolitan, it is viable that a city has bullet trains. One particular salient example of this is Japan. Japan is eminent in the world for their high speed trains. Fast trains will not only help save crucial time of the public, but will also help in improving the condition of the cities.
On the other hand, the construction of these railway lines requires a lot of space in cities and a lot of time must be invested. Improving the existing public transport is much easier and can be done is a short amount of time. Nevertheless, betterment of the public transportation will not solve the ever increasing traffic problem.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that the pros of investing in the railway lines outweighs the cons and hence, should be given priority in a place. Focusing on improving the public transportation might be an agile solution, but it will not be fruitful in the long run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, nevertheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63486842105 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70961397203 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483552631579 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7973247083 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350774396955 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119481515229 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854837714284 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218258360806 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123140091508 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.