In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Railway transportation is one of the significant transportation around the globe. With connecting the longer distances for carrying the goods and people transport and constructing new railway lines over the improving the old. People are looking for the faster ways of transporting comparing with airplanes and ultrasonic planes; this needs the construction of new tracks.
The demand has risen for transportation to faster ways to reach. In this world, the need to be competitive with other emerged industries after the railways. The air travel has become the cheaper and cheaper every year. This shifts the people's interest in it. Similarly, the advancements in the automobile industry will become challenging to the railway. Transportation has been changing rapidly for the advantage of the people by considering speed.
Due to the increase of pollution and its environmental effect, people should prefer shared transport. In people, care for the well-being of the planet prefers the railway when it meets with the speed of alternatives provides. The increase in rising of temperatures the government needs to change the people's preference by shifting towards the poll transport like railway, this takes to invest in creating the railway's lines for super fast trains. The construction of new railway lines will bring new trains to change user choice towards the passengers.
For being competitive with other transport types, the railway lines need to be constructed for super fast trains. The rise of global warming will increase the importance of shared transportation with less pollution like trains when it reaches the expectations of people in terms of speed when I choose the ways to transport into how to time it takes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ures the government needs to change the peoples preference by shifting towards the poll...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98425337806 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501831501832 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.666244724 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273864893461 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104729234295 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683535917571 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190648328798 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444482758477 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.