In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Along with the development of economics and society of a country, the infrastructure system needs corresponding innovation. Some people argue that the government should spend money on building fast train railways, while others believe that the budget should upgrade the available public transport.
In my opinion, each of these strategies has its pros and cons, and the authorities should rely on the country's facilities to decide which method they apply.
On the one hand, constructing new traffic systems is convenient since it neither interferes the transportation nor causes congestion. When the city council decides to build a different railway or road, they will take the opportunity to improve the city planning, so they are likely to place the track in another location to serve this purpose. Thus, people can travel on the available roads as usual while the new ones are under construction. This strategy benefits the city's development in the long run as it eliminates the disadvantages of the old system.
On the other hand, it is more economical to utilize available traffic facilities. For example, in big cities with high population density, many families have to shift to make room for a new track. The budget for compensation can be extremely high in some cases. Moreover, this method keeps the existing resources from being wasted, saving time, money, and labor. For instance, expanding a narrow road is easier and cheaper than building a brand new one.
To summarize, both approaches have different advantages. Hence, the government needs investigation and professional advice to find out the best direction for national development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34732824427 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94188658789 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652671755725 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2307756093 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259135735043 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726188230513 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743302035332 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11952782725 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770042595662 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.