in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Some people argue that the significant amount of money should be considered as a construction budget to develop fast trains railways, while others believe in improvement of existing public transport. I fundamentally agree with the first group and developing fast trains paths, but I think the improvement of current public transportation system could be done simultaneously.
first of all, it should be stuck in mind that modern technology advances such as fast trains, have brought more welfare and eases for people. To be more precise, fast trains as a modern transportation system allow people to commuit faster and easier and reduce the time that people spend in traffic jams.
According to latest figures, in big cities such as Hong Kong, each person spend about 2-3 hours traveling from home to work and vice versa. By using modern trains this time would reduce to less than 1 hour which has countless benefits for people, especially for employees. Commentators believe that the efficiency or work force will increase considerably.
In the other hand, since the development process of new railways and also production of fast trains is a long-term process and might need several years, it is essential to modify the current transport system as soon as possible. In fact, a specific budget should be considered to reconstruct the existing transportation system. I disagree with the view that just new fast trains should be focused and present problems ignored.
Taking everything into consideration, certainly it seems that developing the new fast trains should be the first priority and special budget should be devoted but improvement of existing can be done in parallel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997to 2010. 91
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter:•say why he/she would not enjoy going to college•expl 75
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life. What do you think about it? What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle? 73
- the chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...system could be done simultaneously. first of all, it should be stuck in mind that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...ple spend in traffic jams. According to latest figures, in big cities such as Hong Kon...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, i think, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87891202205 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1875443837 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.545454545 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367709178437 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138431113565 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988103736947 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200524876659 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985324842399 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.