As the number of private cars has increased, so too has the level of pollution in many cities. What can be done to tackle this common problem?
The increase in private cars has been highlighted as an emerging issue that maybe escaping broader public attention.
Given that the issue has the potential for significant environmental impacts, finding solutions is key to mitigating this trend.
Individuals should be involved in tackling this pattern. First, the government and the press should work together to publicize and broadcast the information on how harmful the using of cars is to the living environment and humans' health. This, therefore, raises the awareness of citizens, which then decreases the demand of personal vehicles, particularly cars. Second, in case the effects of the media are not strong enough, policy makers can justify the costs of using cars in efforts to put car drivers' finance in jeopardy, which acts as a deterrent for people to drive or buy a car as a result. For example, some nations have taken steps to make the price of consuming gasoline harder to afford, minimizing the number of cars running on the roads.
Not only individuals, car manufacturers should also be hold responsible for this issue. In fact, levying higher tax on the production of cars is conducive to governmental control on the amount of cars. For instance, due to paying exorbitant tax, many small car companies were forced to stop their business, which reduced cars and therefore protected the environment. In addition, if the government limits the quantity of cars one corporation can produce monthly, the car supply will fall considerably, followed by the decline in peoples demand of private vehicles. This would not only save costs for the government but also lessen the traffic jam that can be damaging to the cities' atmosphere.
In conclusion, even though the proliferation of private cars seems inevitable in today's world, there are various ways to restrict this trend. Enhancing individuals' awareness and controlling car manufacturers can be two of the most useful ways to solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 676, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...traffic jam that can be damaging to the cities atmosphere. In conclusion, even thou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22397476341 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459085732 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7822184575 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237022413757 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835260782637 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040173283763 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119867362977 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571584455609 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.