The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic accidents have been a big concern in different countries and regions. Many people argue that the sole solution to this is to strictly punish rule-breakers. Although tight regulations are needed for driving violations, I believe there are other approaches to road safety since there are other causes of traffic accidents as well.
Undeniably, a large number of traffic accidents stem from rule violations such as speeding, drunk driving, or mere ignorance and to deal with these rule breakers, it makes sense to tighten the execution of punishments. In particular, Vietnam is the country that once saw the highest rate of traffic accident per year. The Vietnamese government, therefore, decided to strengthen traffic law enforcement by increasing the fine amount for speeding and other violations from the beginning of 2017. As a result, there was a 20% drop in the number of accidents at the end of the year.
Nonetheless, there are other causes of accidents on roads such as poor weather and geographical conditions, which require different solutions. Poor weather conditions may include heavy raining, snowing, thunderstorms etc.
That prevent drivers’ sight and ability to control the vehicles. They also may cause other damages that can indirectly cause accidents like broken trees or utility poles on the streets. A more appropriate approach should be to develop technological improvements in motorbikes and cars’ wheels or brake systems. Moreover, bad geographical conditions are dangerous as well. Accidents happen almost every day on narrow rocky roads in the mountainous areas, not to mention occasional landslide. One solution to this is to invest more in road reconstruction and provide extensive warning signs on high-risk routes.
In conclusion, punishing reckless drivers can be effective but only solves part of the problem. To thoroughly ensure road safety, different approaches should be taken for different situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...traffic accidents as well. Undeniably, a large number of traffic accidents stem from rule violat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03149944564 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4906501328 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5882352941 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712073680521 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217387177914 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271929602499 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435670440658 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299983768666 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.