People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to the massive development of global economy and advanced technology, people now can pursue goods in more reasonable prices compared to they did in the past. While some individuals argue that the drawbacks are more likely to outweigh the benefits, I personally am of the opposite opinions due to some following arguments.
On the one hand, it is exceedingly beneficial for customers in the community to buy low-priced products. The first reason is that people have a chance to buy more goods when the prices are lower on the shelves. For example, a brand new smart TV or smartphone now in my country is affordable in lieu of costing a fortune as it did ten years ago. Consequently, almost all my family members and my friends possess at least a cell phone, thereby it is easier for us to keep in touch routinely. The second reason is that the national economy can be boosted thanks to the ever-increasing demand in the market. More job opportunities will be created since many manufacturing factories expand their sales of consumer goods.
On the other hand, some contend that there remain some drawbacks. Firstly, lower-priced products are invariably associated with poor quality since factories now shift their attention to how to create a product with more reasonable prices. Thus, these products may be breakable and not durable. Secondly, since the more reasonable-price products are, the more likely people buy unnecessary items which sometimes is considered extravagant. However, in my perspective, the advantages of lower cost undoubtedly outweigh its disadvantages. Customers nowadays can buy an item with cheaper prices, but in high quality provided that they consider conscientiously before deciding to buy anything which also help them to pursue unnecessary things.
In conclusion, although there are strong arguments for both views, it seems to me that the benefits of cheaper products are far more important than its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24203821656 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00835247131 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7281875863 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19719068881 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608792203348 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441797125635 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108854722271 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508519973206 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.