People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about natural world?
More and more people have minor knowledge about how nature plays an important part in our daily lives. While there are some reasons to explain for this problem, there are solutions to encourage people to study more about natural environment.
The changing of the living habitat could be the main reason to explain the lack of appreciation for the natural world. Back to the old-time, people were forced to hunting, fishing or planting to survive. But in the present, a majority of workforce spend most of their lives in a closed working environment such as office , factory without any contact with nature. From the lifestyle prospective, young people are no longer interested in outdoor activities. With the development of technology, they are more easily to approach an electronic appliance such as smart phone, tablet or laptop, which brings about lots of joyousness when using them. The using these appliances occupies most of leisure time because people pay so much attention to it that they gradually disconnect with natural environment.
However, some solutions can enhance the link between human and nature. First, organizing outdoor activities as way to connect employees such as field trip, picnic is an effective method to solve this issue. Second, schools should involve more studies about environment in teaching program. Finally, an environmentally friendly task like plating trees should be encouraged in community to raise conscious about protecting environment.
To sum up, although there are some important reasons why there is little public understanding of the natural world, there are always some practical methods to overcome the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...losed working environment such as office , factory without any contact with nature...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40229885057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74888665344 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8439858042 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375578273811 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115589811417 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107469139003 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226556855612 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129014486394 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.