" Prevention is better than cure". Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.
Discuss both sides.
The author of statement proposes that it would be more fruitful if we focus on preventing diseases rather than curing them. It is an interesting hypothesis. However, I strongly disagree, since it overlooks the principles of scientific development and other possible scenarios as well.
First, It is simply impossible to prevent a disease when one does not have any clue of its workings. Researchers spend years, decades researching on a various pathogens, bacteria that are detrimental to human physiology. As a result of their grueling work, we have successfully eradicated diseases that have haunted humanity for time immemorial. However, this is exactly what the statement overlooks. It is easier to find a solution to a problem if you know and understand the problem. Let us consider an example. We have all heard, or read about the deadly Ebola disease, for which we have yet to find a cure. Now the question that needs to be answered is-- how can one prevent Ebola from spreading if one simply does not understand how it works and its genetic material? In this case research is well suited and a must.
Second, Preventive measures can lead to newer problems. Let us consider another example. Recently the hot button topic in medical community was 'Superbugs'. Superbugs are pathogens, more precisely bacteria, which grew resilient to medicines, which were designed to stop them from spreading diseases. The reason for this unfortunate development is, as stated by several studies and medical experts, that we took the preventive measures, in this case anti-biotics, way too far. Now we need new way to deal with this new type of threat.
In conclusion, we can see that the proverb mentioned by the author is reduced to mere platitude, owing to the scientific advancements. It is very important that we focus on the research and development of our medical technology, since it has served us well and it will continue to serve us for foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'pathogen'?
Suggestion: pathogen
...years, decades researching on a various pathogens, bacteria that are detrimental to human...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, well, in conclusion, you know, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90091354719 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4808119139 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1277937585 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350185579561 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520074828264 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797284278322 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460026964519 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.