The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions.
Some people believe that different types of technology result to vast disparities between rich users and poor user; whilst others take the view that it makes a positive effect. From my perspective, it is true that this gap is being increased due to technological developments.
It is clear that people having high living-standard accessed to technological world long time ago. The latest smartphones, the newest laptops, wireless broadband Internet are common in developed countries. It enable these people to work at home or anywhere in the world as long as there is wireless fidelity in this place, they also do shopping online and wait for shops sending products directly to their addresses; whereas citizens in poor countries just afford to buy old mobile phones or laptops or some technique
On the other hand, thanks to developments of technology, poor residents in developing or under developing nations could be able to access to the Internet and broaden their knowledge outside of their countries. For example, in the past, only people in the developed nations accessed to world-class libraries; however, Internet allows everyone despite rich one or poor one to have accession to the same materials.
In conclusion, though there are some benefits from technological developments, I strongly believe that the range of technology available makes the gap become larger and larger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
...t are common in developed countries. It enable these people to work at home or anywher...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld as long as there is wireless fidelity in this place, they also do shopping onl...
^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bile phones or laptops or some technique On the other hand, thanks to development...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35454545455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95218087197 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.807885679 49.4020404114 283% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.285714286 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7142857143 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218343592242 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100262018327 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071133555391 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13779698907 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848837175443 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.