Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary period, in order to address the issue of poverty, developed countries tend to provide poorer nations with money. As this solution is uneffective, it is better to offer other types of help. I partly agree with this statement and will illustrate my opinions with relevant examples.
Undoubtedly, developing countries need the supports from others in financial resources. Due to the shortage of money, they are still facing several problems that the government could not even meet the primary demands of inhabitants. For instance, children in impoverished area do not receive the initial education because the government's finance is not adequate to construct more schools. Furthermore, if these countries did not receive the financial aid, there would be more homeless people when the authority could not buil up accommodations. Afterall, money is the most crucial aid to help impoverished countries.
Apart from financial support, there are several ways to support developing countries. First of all, developed countries should send tangible goods such as food and clean water - two essential factors keeping people alive. An example is that the majority of African children, who are suffering from famine and the water shortage, need urgent helps from the international. Secondly, these areas are severly lack of human resources especially the well-qualified labours. Therefore, rich countries should should encourage the professionals as well as seasoned workers to do volunteering and help these nations.
In conclusion, economics plays an important role in the development of one country. Therefore, money is the most significant aid that could help developing nations. However, these regions also need to be supported in food and workers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Task 2 Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of pr 84
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 61
- Task 2 In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it 67
- Sports events get the nations together and help alleviate the violence in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 49
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ority could not buil up accommodations. Afterall, money is the most crucial aid to help ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...fied labours. Therefore, rich countries should should encourage the professionals as well as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...he most significant aid that could help developing nations. However, these regions also ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58364312268 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99097866271 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9941400885 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264053486639 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822842696229 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727793614059 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145649452207 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416071980832 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.