Rich countries should not employ skilled labor from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the skilled and intellectual workforces who come from poor areas should not be employed by rich areas, causing public controversy around the world. Although many skilled workforces are truly necessary for poorer nations to drive the nation's economy, this cannot be viewed as rich countries have no right to receive talented people from other nations.
There are many reasons why the move to work in wealthy countries is a valuable opportunity for the skilled workers of impoverished countries. First, Advanced systems and high-level technology are strong points in rich countries, which have always been admired and envied by poor countries in the world. For instance, to achieve a prosperous economy or social well-being of a nation, highly educated people from poor countries need to be exposed and gain experience by going to rich countries to learn and experience even knowledge that can be applied to further promote their country's development situation. Second, another advantage of the rich ones is they have advanced education to educate them to be a talent as they lack other necessary factors like high services or management experience that affluent countries have accumulated for hundreds of years. For example, if a skillful worker is talented and hardworking, he can receive far more salary in developed countries than in developing countries, have more chances to discover the most innovative technologies, and it is most vital to raise his family’s living level and social status.
On the other hand, despite the abundance of qualified workers, backward nations have not figured out innovative ways to get their countries out of the brain drain. Besides, moving skilled labor to developed countries to work as hired labor, is also considered a wise indirect way that helps their country progress more. Furthermore, this will make their country in the future will not lag behind today's rich countries. Even, unemployment in countries around the world today has been reaching alarming levels. Especially, some notable countries such as South Africa, Spain, Greece have been facing the highest unemployment risk, and if this issue is not handled more firmly, it will lead to serious consequences, related to the economy and society of these countries.
In conclusion, migrating laborers to other countries to work as hired workers is beneficial for both wealthy and less-developed countries. Therefore, I disagree with the view that skilled workers from poor countries should not be employed by rich countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...cessary for poorer nations to drive the nations economy, this cannot be viewed as rich ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e talented people from other nations. There are many reasons why the move to w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mily’s living level and social status. On the other hand, despite the abundance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onomy and society of these countries. In conclusion, migrating laborers to oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35910224439 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79823390674 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548628428928 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4279569864 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.5 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428894429258 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170382176022 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10509407667 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294164317968 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076282242422 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.