For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that, teachers persuade on pupils intellectual and social development has been highest than their care takers. However, in this essay agree with the statement because, parents role on such things might be limited in some extent. Such as in terms of ideas of communication and inter personal relation ship with teachers and peers would be more in school hours.
To begin with, academic criteria and skill development would be prone to enhance during teaching periods and interaction in between. Teachers has the knowledge and skill to analyse each students ability based on their long term connection with various children. Moreover, teachers have the training to deal with different kinds of children behaviour and attitudes during their teaching program. Similarly, communication towards teaching faculty and co students inside the school atmosphere would flourish pupil social development and teachers could correct if it is needed. For instance, studies shows that, hostel students who is willing to stay with teachers emphasize less fear to interact with others and better IQ than parental controlled students.
On the other hand, parental care affect children to be more dependent and needs intelligent advice for every situation. In other words, parents have the limitation to check children social connection and communication with others. At once, ideas and skills are more developed within the school environment because, most probably home works may be remained for parents. In addition, most parents represents, poor evidence to detect critical thinking or innovative progress of their children as soon as like teachers. For example, good teachers inspiration and support was the outcome of most famous scientist in India Dr. A P J Abdul kalam mentioned his book.
To sum up, although, without parental support children could not reach in esteem position. Nevertheless, in comparison, teachers presence would deliver high IQ and better social growth of school children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring teaching periods and interaction in between. Teachers has the knowledge and ...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...the knowledge and skill to analyse each students ability based on their long term connec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dealing
...n. Moreover, teachers have the training to deal with different kinds of children behavi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and, parental care affect children to be more dependent and needs intelligent adv...
^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...oon as like teachers. For example, good teachers inspiration and support was the outcome...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49675324675 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71387207126 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7521915916 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309217319602 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101238146393 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547971354933 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181999882244 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446307904563 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.