For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that when it comes to children in their school years, teachers exert a greater impact on their intelligence and social development than their parents. I totally agree with this view and my reasons are stated below.
The main reason why I believe that teachers play a more important role than parents in fostering children’s intelligence is that the little ones spend the majority of their learning time in class. While parents mostly dedicate their time at home to playing with or to catering for the needs of their offsprings, teachers are responsible for the transmission of knowledge and motivating the youngsters to learn. As a result, children would develop basic concepts of the world as well as other attributes of intelligence, namely problem-solving skills and imagination, with the help of their teachers.
Regarding children’s social skills development, I am convinced that parents pale in comparison with teachers since school boys and girls are exposed to more social contact at school than at home. This is especially true for a unique child in the family, which is becoming more common given the fight against the population explosion in developing countries, lacking opportunities of making friends of his age. In this case, by going to school and involving in teamwork activities organized and guided by teachers, such child can learn to work with his peers, to argue and cooperate in various social settings.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the statement that teachers prevail over parents in terms of fostering the cognitive and social development of children. This can be explained by the fact that children learn much more under the guidance of teachers, and school provides better social environment than home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 78
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 78
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...eachers. Regarding children’s social skills development, I am convinced that parent...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24295774648 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87507492808 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4392507003 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.9 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422860871797 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168168366267 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116988067864 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273912193868 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906287666105 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.