In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed?
It is true that in the academic environment, girls have a tendency of learning arts while boys are on side of science. There are some factors for this trend need analyzing.
Among various reasons for this trend, prejudice and inequality are the most explicit ones. Firstly, young girls are often considered emotional, profound and easily sympathy with surroundings while boys are taught to become strong, enthusiastic and confident. As a result, at the early stage, adults encourage girls to participate indoor activities like drawing, writing, and acting; however, by contrast, they require boys to enjoy outdoor activities like hunting insects, flying kites, building artifact houses...In long term, children believe that acts show feminine and exploring activities show masculine and they tend to choose subjects based on their prejudices. Besides, the inequality is a contributor to their decisions at school. It is true that, in a family, women often do the household chores while men take the responsibility of earning a living. Meanwhile, jobs of arts allow people to work in a flexible timetable and ones related science are lucrative occupations. Therefore, girls seem to choose arts to facilitate their marriage life later while boys like science to have prosperity in the future.
For this above reasons, I am convinced that this negative trend should be altered. The first reason for changing this negative tendency is that I believe people are free to choose what career what they want to succeed as well as what subjects they want to follow without the interference of society. In reality, there are plenty of girls innate born with logical ability while numerous boys are talented in drawing or acting. Their talents should be acknowledged and grown up to create innovations for the humanity. In addition to, when young students are free to choose subjects, the inequality would be gradually eradicated. Women are no longer be weak or depend on men while men are no longer hide their emotions and pretend as strong.
In conclusion, unreasonable social norms are mainly responsible for choosing subjects of children a and apparently, this trend should be changed for the personal developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 514, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lying kites, building artifact houses...In long term, children believe that acts s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26345609065 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78378452817 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.6800926112 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456610582195 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129966457702 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797441215908 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277856918491 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342883635559 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.