Student's school curriculum is now full of a variety of lessons. These range from math and physic to history and social science. It has been argued by both experts and parents that there is no logical reason to study a different type of lessons when a person won't need them all in their future job. It seems that, however, even if we do not need all those lessons we receive, we should be familiar with them.
On the one hand, nowadays careers are becoming more and more professional which require an expert to handle them. In fact, in today's world expertise has become the nitty-gritty of every job. In other words, a successful person is a person who is professional in their profession. Accordingly, concentrating on other lessons might take the focus an individual needs to become an expert. Therefore, dedicating too much of a student's time toward different lessons would not help them to be a professional on any of those lessons.
On the other hand, although schools are responsible for preparing students for future life, it must be taken into the consideration that they are responsible for all students, not a particular person. Indeed, a vast variety of students participate in a class which they might have different future prospects for themselves. Some of them tend to study history in the future and some others might choose math. In this case, it does not seem rational to cut some lessons from the school's syllabus.
Moreover, having a glance at other lessons might help students to invent some interdisciplinary things. For example, LCD screens require knowledge both in electronic major and chemistry major. Thus, if pedagogical experts had denied teaching these two lessons, we would not be able to watch TV in this quality right now.
By way of conclusion, while teaching different lessons to students seems to be kind of irrational in some ways, the benefits and the necessity of it will cover its drawbacks. From my point of view the way we now receive different lessons is still working and no need to change them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...m rational to cut some lessons from the schools syllabus. Moreover, having a glance ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in fact, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8908045977 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74051168226 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1767549836 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119496048395 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386281090844 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301965436794 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655114413938 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125158286654 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.