Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do
whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The constraints of regulations have been highlighted as an emerging issue, escaping broader public attention, especially in arnachy-oriented nations. Despite the suggestion that lawless societies could hamper social cohesion, I partially agree with it.
On the one hand, lawlessness acts as an incentive for the destruction of civilians ’lives and economical power, which constitute the basic society of a nation. From the living perspective, if laws and rules are no longer enforced, individuals could easily commit fenolies without punishment, causing mass casualties. For example, drug cartels are able to traffic drugs all over the world, leading an exponential rise in cases of deaths stemming from drug overdose and substance abuse. From the economic viewpoint, without the financial regulations, corporations could commit violations of fiscal and monetary policies as well as taxation duties, especially tax avoidance. This could make a functional economy more susceptible to budget deficit, making financial collapse and national bankruptcy inevitable products.
On the other hand, it is true that societies could sometimes perform better without the enactment of laws and rules. Specifically, some traditional articles emphazing patriarchal and extremist beliefs are still enshrined in the penal codes, decelerating the formation of social democracy and basic human rights. In fact, many Middle Eastern nations criminalize homosexuality and sodomy, which would basically oppress the basic personal freedom and expression. Another shining example could be seen in many communist-based nations with the constitutions imposing regulations censoring media corporations and detaining journalists expressing views against the regime, which obviously deprive citizens of basic media liberty.
In conclusion, I do not frown upon lawless societies due to the consequences of social collapse but official authorities should legislate based on citizens’ interests to guarantee their basic human rights and personal freedom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...estruction of civilians 'lives and economical power, which constitute the basic socie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05574912892 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08754057422 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686411149826 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7551207498 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1227659335 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424527243675 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383391186378 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722909314949 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181514034626 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.65 8.58950901804 136% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.