Some believe it is important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many claim that spending money for outdoor communal spaces in cities and towns is necessary. I also agree with this view point because it would enhance economic growth and public health.
Large outdoor public spaces would attract visitors, investors and social gatherings. Such programms would provide financial stability to the city council. For instance, Mananchira Park at Calicut city has the major role in economic development of the Calicut District in Kerala. Likewise, large communal areas would flourishes the beauty of towns and its Members. Such areas may encourage peoples to go for walking, do exercises, and improve general health with safe and secure spaces. Lesiure time at such areas may inhibit the hustle and bustle of the city and its residents.
Meanwhile, some people disagree with the statement because, spending money to healthcare systems and other facilities is more beneficial. However, peoples can minimize the risk of developing illness rather than approach to health care facilities including self exericses and preventions. Proper disribution of money to various projects including innovative developments in outdoor spaces is better for environmental health rather than protection
To sum up, it is beneficial to invest more to develop large communal areas for nature, public health and financial growth of the city and towns.
- Some people tend to buy products or get services instantly without waiting Why is it happening Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Some believe it is important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The diagram below shows how the solar powered water pump work Summarise the information and selecting the features
- The graphs show the changes in spending habits of people in UK betweeon 1971 ans 2001 Write a report to a university lecture and descr8be the data 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
Many claim that spending money for outdoor communa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'flourish'
Suggestion: flourish
...ala Likewise large communal areas would flourishes the beauty of towns and its Members Suc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...bustle of the city and its residents Meanwhile some people disagree with the statement...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironmental health rather than protection To sum up it is beneficial to invest mor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, likewise, may, so, while, as for, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44497607656 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57296178032 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 209.0 20.2975951904 1030% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1138.0 106.682146367 1067% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 209.0 20.7667163134 1006% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 77.0 7.06120827912 1090% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250506868786 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250506868786 0.084324248473 297% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163007503445 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499883012041 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 108.7 13.0946893788 830% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -149.12 50.2224549098 -297% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 86.0 11.3001002004 761% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.75 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.99 8.58950901804 221% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 85.6 10.1190380762 846% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 86.0 10.7795591182 798% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.